Doctrinal Review, a Huge Asset

From time to time, I am asked about the impact of doctrinal review on the products we produce at Concordia Publishing House.

For those who are unfamiliar with the process, every thing that we publish at CPH is reviewed to ensure its faithfulness to the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions before it is published.

• The reviewers are appointed by the office of the president of the synod. They are chosen for their theological credentials and assigned reviews for material that is within their area of knowledge and expertise; the reviewers for children's material are different from those who review our Concordia Commentary Series, for example.
• The process is completely anonymous; the reviewer is not given the names of the authors or editors of the material they review and the editor does not know who the reviewer is. All communication is handled through a highly discrete doctrinal review clerk at CPH. 
• Material can be determined to be "in agreement with Lutheran doctrine," "in agreement, but here are some suggestions for improvement," or "not in agreement" with specifics noted, suggestions made for correction, and a requirement that the reviewer see the material after it has been corrected.
• Material is never subjected to "second opinions." Once approved, the material (a hymn text, for example) may be used many times, but it is not resubmitted each time; reviewers are not invited to critique one another.
• Finally, a reviewer's decision can be appealed, but only to Synod's doctrinal review commission. Such appeals are very rare and are almost never made by the publishing house. Our goal is always to bring our material into compliance with the reviewer's decision.

It can also be noted that CPH has an internal "doctrinal review" system for artwork we commission for use in our curricula and books. Editors familiar with biblical culture ensure that illustrations depicting biblical or liturgical people and scenes do so accurately.

I've worked under this system for over twenty years, and have grown to appreciate it. On a few rare occasions, I have chaffed at having to revise an activity to accommodate a reviewer's concern. Far more often, I have given thanks that a reviewer helped me speak clearly or rescued me from putting material in print that could mislead someone or teaching something in error. The doctrinal review process guarantees that what our material teaches is the truth according to God's Word, not the truth according to Tom Nummela.

Far from having a negative impact on our ability to produce excellent material, the doctrinal review process guarantees that the material you purchase from us is the best we can make it.

God's blessings as you teach His children His Word!

Time for a Change?

A marketing study I reviewed recently, including a broad range of denominations using curriculum from a multitude of publishers, reported an interesting finding.

Christian churches seem to change Sunday School materials about every two years on average, with many of them changing every year!

Why?

Those who prepared the report did not ask that question. What do you think?

• Is it just for something new?
• Is it because things are not working and changing the curriculum seems the best, only, or easiest fix?
• Is it because leadership changes and wants to make the change?

It makes me wonder, how many Sunday School curricula are there that would really meet the needs of a congregation seeking material that clearly teaches the Bible from a Lutheran perspective? (I know of at least two. : )

How often has your congregation changed Sunday School material?

What prompted the change?

God bless you as you teach His children His Word!

Evaluating Curricula

Last week, a colleague asked me about an instrument for evaluating Sunday School curricula. I was happy to point him to the documents that are my point of reference on this question (Sunday School Basic, 2005 CPH, www.cph.org; "How Good Is Your Curriculum?" Teachers Interaction, pp. 14-17, Summer 2012; the TI article is a redaction of a chapter in the book).
Some who choose to use these resources will quickly see, and perhaps object, that the evaluation questions have to do with theology and church practice, not with appearance and instructional methods. Here's why!

How NOT to Evaluate Religious Education Material
A common method for reviewing curriculum uses a series of characteristics, criteria, such as theology, appearance, active learning, cultural diversity, out-standing features. Each criteria is evaluated separately and equally, often with some kind of grading or points system. The curriculum receiving the highest number of points or the highest grade is assumed to be the best curriculum, the one you should purchase.

The problem with this method is that all criteria are not of equal importance in Christian education. (Note the emphasis! I'm not saying that some things may not be important; I'm saying they are not equally important.) In fact, when teaching theology, a curriculum's ability to teach the requisite theology is the first and foremost thing to judge. Imagine the "largest pumpkin" competition as the state fair. No matter how large, attractive, and tasty, the winning pumpkin cannot be a watermelon. You should not even enter a watermelon in the pumpkin contest.

Choosing Materials for a Lutheran Sunday School
Just so, when choosing curricula for your Lutheran Sunday School, you really first need to determine that the curriculum is in fact Lutheran, that it will teach Lutheran theology. There are some very attractive materials on the market from non-Lutheran and non-denominational publishers. And, in order to sell you their watermelons (non-Lutheran materials), they will argue that they should be considered in your pumpkin (Lutheran materials) contest. But they will not teach Lutheran theology. They will teach decision theology, moralism, salvation through works. They will not teach about Law and Gospel or the means of grace. Does it make a difference? You bet! An eternal one! (If you are still thinking that a watermelon might work, review my recent post "Theology Added?")

My argument is that the curriculum needs to meet these minimum standards. If you are able to find several curricula that teach Lutheran theology for Lutheran children, then by all means, choose the one that best fits your needs or most excites your volunteers.

You know that I work for a publishing house that strives to prepare the best possible resources for Lutheran Christian education. I am not without bias. But I am passionate about teaching God's children His Word.